Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links marked with (Ad). If you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Materials Scientists Salary in Minnesota: Cost of Living Adjusted (2025)

Last updated: 2025 BLS data · Page refreshed:

What does a Materials Scientists salary really buy you in Minnesota?

Minnesota is 2.3% cheaper than the US average

Data: BLS OEWS 2025 + BEA Regional Price Parities 2022 • Updated 2026-05-19

Nominal Salary
$132,160
Median annual (2025)
+2.4%
Real Purchasing Power
$135,271
COL-adjusted (RPP=97.7)

Minnesota Cost of Living Index

Minnesota's Regional Price Parity (RPP) is 97.7, meaning prices are 2.3% lower the national average. A Materials Scientists earning $132,160 in Minnesota has the equivalent purchasing power of $135,271 in an average-cost US state.

MN: 97.7
Cheapest (~85) US Avg (100) Priciest (~115)

Salary Breakdown: Nominal vs. COL-Adjusted

Every dollar goes further in low-cost states. Here is how each salary percentile compares after adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living.

Percentile Nominal Salary COL-Adjusted Difference
10th Percentile (P10) $83,500 $85,465 +$1,965
25th Percentile (P25) $101,540 $103,930 +$2,390
Median (P50) $132,160 $135,271 +$3,111
75th Percentile (P75) $138,320 $141,576 +$3,256
90th Percentile (P90) $172,500 $176,560 +$4,060
Key Insight

Minnesota's cost of living is close to the national average, so $132,160 keeps most of its value at $135,271 in real terms. Location choice here is more about career opportunities than cost arbitrage.

What the Cost-of-Living Data Says

Minnesota Sits Near the National Cost Benchmark

RPP 97.7

With an RPP of 97.7, Minnesota is within a few percent of the national cost-of-living baseline. Salary adjustment for Materials Scientists is therefore minor — what you earn is close to what you'd keep in real purchasing power.

Minor COL Adjustment for This Salary

+2.4%

After adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living, $132,160 nominal nets out to $135,271 in real purchasing power — a small 2.4% gain. The state's cost profile is close enough to average that COL alone shouldn't drive location decisions for this Materials Scientists.

Top-Quartile Adjusted Earnings in Minnesota

#5 / 30

Ranked on COL-adjusted median pay for Materials Scientists, Minnesota places #5 of 30 states — top quartile. Either nominal wages run high, cost of living runs low, or both.

Best States for Materials Scientists (After Cost of Living)

Where does Materials Scientists salary stretch the furthest? Top 10 states ranked by COL-adjusted median salary.

$157,360
RPP 112.5
$149,187
RPP 92.3
3. Indiana
$142,200
RPP 91.8
4. Oregon
$141,228
RPP 106.6
$135,271
RPP 97.7
6. Utah
$134,222
RPP 94.5
7. Kansas
$128,322
RPP 90.0
$124,234
RPP 101.3
$122,481
RPP 106.4
10. New York
$122,434
RPP 107.6

Minnesota ranks #5 out of 30 states for Materials Scientists after cost-of-living adjustment.

How much do you actually take home? See Materials Scientists take-home pay in Minnesota after taxes →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the real salary for a Materials Scientists in Minnesota after cost of living?

A Materials Scientists in Minnesota earns a median salary of $132,160 per year. After adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living (RPP=97.7), the real purchasing power is $135,271 — a +2.4% difference.

Is Minnesota expensive to live in?

Minnesota's cost of living is 2.3% lower than the national average according to the BEA Regional Price Parities (2022). The RPP index for Minnesota is 97.7 (US average = 100).

What are Regional Price Parities (RPP)?

Regional Price Parities (RPPs) are price indexes published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) that measure differences in price levels across states. They are expressed as a percentage of the national average (US = 100). Higher RPP means higher cost of living.

How is the cost-of-living adjusted salary calculated?

The adjusted salary is calculated as: Nominal Salary x (100 / RPP). For a Materials Scientists in Minnesota: $132,160 x (100 / 97.7) = $135,271. This represents what the salary would be worth in a state with average living costs.

Is it better to be a Materials Scientists in Minnesota financially?

From a purchasing power perspective, yes. A Materials Scientists in Minnesota enjoys 2.4% more buying power than the nominal salary suggests, because living costs are below the national average. However, other factors like job availability, career growth, and quality of life also matter.

What To Do Next

Some links are affiliate links. See our disclosure.

Related Salary Pages

Get Monthly Salary Insights & Career Data

Free data-driven career updates — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Join career-minded Americans who use data to make smarter decisions. Privacy Policy