Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links marked with (Ad). If you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Conservation Scientists Salary in Minnesota: Cost of Living Adjusted (2025)

Last updated: 2025 BLS data · Page refreshed:

What does a Conservation Scientists salary really buy you in Minnesota?

Minnesota is 2.3% cheaper than the US average

Data: BLS OEWS 2025 + BEA Regional Price Parities 2022 • Updated 2026-05-19

Nominal Salary
$71,280
Median annual (2025)
+2.4%
Real Purchasing Power
$72,958
COL-adjusted (RPP=97.7)

Minnesota Cost of Living Index

Minnesota's Regional Price Parity (RPP) is 97.7, meaning prices are 2.3% lower the national average. A Conservation Scientists earning $71,280 in Minnesota has the equivalent purchasing power of $72,958 in an average-cost US state.

MN: 97.7
Cheapest (~85) US Avg (100) Priciest (~115)

Salary Breakdown: Nominal vs. COL-Adjusted

Every dollar goes further in low-cost states. Here is how each salary percentile compares after adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living.

Percentile Nominal Salary COL-Adjusted Difference
10th Percentile (P10) $45,740 $46,816 +$1,076
25th Percentile (P25) $51,630 $52,845 +$1,215
Median (P50) $71,280 $72,958 +$1,678
75th Percentile (P75) $88,670 $90,757 +$2,087
90th Percentile (P90) $106,330 $108,833 +$2,503
Key Insight

Minnesota's cost of living is close to the national average, so $71,280 keeps most of its value at $72,958 in real terms. Location choice here is more about career opportunities than cost arbitrage.

What the Cost-of-Living Data Says

Minnesota Sits Near the National Cost Benchmark

RPP 97.7

With an RPP of 97.7, Minnesota is within a few percent of the national cost-of-living baseline. Salary adjustment for Conservation Scientists is therefore minor — what you earn is close to what you'd keep in real purchasing power.

Minor COL Adjustment for This Salary

+2.4%

After adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living, $71,280 nominal nets out to $72,958 in real purchasing power — a small 2.4% gain. The state's cost profile is close enough to average that COL alone shouldn't drive location decisions for this Conservation Scientists.

Below-Median Adjusted Pay

#27 / 51

Minnesota's rank of #27 of 51 states means real purchasing power for Conservation Scientists trails the national half-way line.

Best States for Conservation Scientists (After Cost of Living)

Where does Conservation Scientists salary stretch the furthest? Top 10 states ranked by COL-adjusted median salary.

1. Idaho
$88,594
RPP 91.8
$88,509
RPP 90.6
3. Wyoming
$88,476
RPP 91.9
4. Alabama
$87,699
RPP 87.8
$87,125
RPP 88.7
$86,818
RPP 88.0
$86,175
RPP 92.3
$85,248
RPP 116.6
$85,077
RPP 89.8
10. Arkansas
$84,665
RPP 86.6

Minnesota ranks #27 out of 51 states for Conservation Scientists after cost-of-living adjustment.

How much do you actually take home? See Conservation Scientists take-home pay in Minnesota after taxes →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the real salary for a Conservation Scientists in Minnesota after cost of living?

A Conservation Scientists in Minnesota earns a median salary of $71,280 per year. After adjusting for Minnesota's cost of living (RPP=97.7), the real purchasing power is $72,958 — a +2.4% difference.

Is Minnesota expensive to live in?

Minnesota's cost of living is 2.3% lower than the national average according to the BEA Regional Price Parities (2022). The RPP index for Minnesota is 97.7 (US average = 100).

What are Regional Price Parities (RPP)?

Regional Price Parities (RPPs) are price indexes published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) that measure differences in price levels across states. They are expressed as a percentage of the national average (US = 100). Higher RPP means higher cost of living.

How is the cost-of-living adjusted salary calculated?

The adjusted salary is calculated as: Nominal Salary x (100 / RPP). For a Conservation Scientists in Minnesota: $71,280 x (100 / 97.7) = $72,958. This represents what the salary would be worth in a state with average living costs.

Is it better to be a Conservation Scientists in Minnesota financially?

From a purchasing power perspective, yes. A Conservation Scientists in Minnesota enjoys 2.4% more buying power than the nominal salary suggests, because living costs are below the national average. However, other factors like job availability, career growth, and quality of life also matter.

What To Do Next

Some links are affiliate links. See our disclosure.

Related Salary Pages

Get Monthly Salary Insights & Career Data

Free data-driven career updates — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Join career-minded Americans who use data to make smarter decisions. Privacy Policy